The Curious Disappearance of Cursive Writing

 I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but...

...why exactly did schools decide cursive was the skill that had to go?

I'm told it's because we needed more time for technology. Fair enough. Kids should know how to use a keyboard. But somehow they can spend hours learning standardized test strategies and social media trends, yet fifteen minutes a day teaching handwriting became too much?

Call me crazy, but three thoughts cross my mind.

First, if nobody can read cursive anymore, fewer people can read old letters, journals, family records, and even parts of our own history without someone translating it for us. That's an odd way to preserve the past. It means that someone else (the government) will have to recreate those documents and translate for younger generations. Think about the things that will probably be "lost in translation".

Second, it seems that the less we write by hand, the more dependent we become on devices. Every note, reminder, and idea now belongs to a phone, tablet, or cloud server somewhere instead of on a piece of paper. No more analog thoughts. Only digital ones that can be tracked and somehow monetized with ads. Funny how independence quietly became inconvenience.

Third, signatures are slowly becoming meaningless. Today's kids are growing up in a world where a fingerprint or face scan matters more than their own handwriting. Maybe that's progress. Maybe it's just one more thing we're handing over to technology.

Do I actually believe there's a secret meeting where people plotted the downfall of cursive? Maybe. Maybe not.

But I do think we've become a little too eager to throw away simple skills because they're "old-fashioned." Not everything from the past deserves to stay there.

Sometimes common sense isn't asking if something is old. It's asking whether replacing it actually made us better.

Young People: Your Clothes Speak Before You Do

There's an old saying that goes, "Don't judge a book by its cover."

Beautiful sentiment.

Too bad society never got the memo.

Whether we like it or not, people make assumptions before we ever open our mouths. They judge our hairstyle, our shoes, our posture, our facial expressions, and yes... our clothes. Is it fair? Not always. Is it reality? Every single day.

Common sense tells us that first impressions matter because people are wired to make quick decisions. Before someone hears your intelligence, experiences your personality, or appreciates your work ethic, they've already built a mental profile based on what they see.

That's why attire isn't about vanity. It's about strategy.

Dress for the Opportunity You Want

Too many people insist, "People should accept me for who I am."

In a perfect world, they would. In the real world, perception opens doors long before personality gets the chance.

Imagine showing up to a job interview wearing gym shorts and flip-flops. You might be the smartest applicant in the room, but you've already created doubt before answering the first question.

Now imagine attending a funeral dressed for the beach or walking into a courtroom wearing clothes better suited for a gym. Your outfit instantly communicates that you either don't understand the moment or don't respect it. Nowadays, it's usually the latter.

Clothing has always been a language. The only question is whether you're speaking it fluently.

Every Environment Has a Uniform

Not every uniform comes with a badge. Business professionals wear suits because they project competence. Construction workers wear safety gear because the job demands protection. Doctors wear lab coats because patients associate them with trust and expertise. Athletes wear uniforms because they represent a team.

Even casual environments have unwritten dress codes.

You wouldn't wear a tuxedo to mow the lawn. You probably wouldn't wear pajamas to a wedding (although I think that I've seen it before).

Context matters.

Dressing appropriately isn't pretending to be someone else. It's showing respect for the occasion and the people around you.

The Reality of a Prejudicial Society

Let's stop pretending prejudice only exists in major social issues because folks prejudge everything.

Restaurants, neighborhoods, cars, businesses, and people.

That doesn't mean we should encourage prejudice. It means we should understand how the world works.  You can't always control someone else's assumptions, but you can control the information you give them. 

Your appearance becomes part of your introduction.

Why make your first sentence harder to overcome?

Confidence Begins Before the Conversation

Something interesting happens when you dress with intention.

• You stand differently.
• You walk differently.
• You communicate differently.
• Your confidence often rises to meet your presentation.

It's not because expensive clothes magically create confidence. It's because preparation creates confidence. When you know you look appropriate for the situation, one less distraction exists between you and your goal.

Common Sense Isn't About Expensive Labels

This isn't an argument for designer brands or thousand-dollar suits. It's about cleanliness, neatness, and appropriateness. 

You don't need a luxury wardrobe to make a strong impression. You simply need to understand where you're going and dress accordingly.

A well-fitted outfit from a discount store will almost always outshine an expensive outfit that's wrinkled, stained, or completely inappropriate for the occasion.

The Bottom Line

Life gives everyone enough obstacles without volunteering to create new ones. If changing your shirt, cleaning up your shoes, or putting on the right outfit increases your chances of being taken seriously, why fight that reality?

Your clothes won't define your character, but they often determine whether people stay around long enough to discover it.

And that's not shallow. That's reality.

The Bulls, the Lion, and American Politics

One of Aesop's lesser-known fables tells the story of several bulls grazing together in a field. A lion wants to eat them, but as long as the bulls stand united, he cannot attack. Frustrated, the lion spreads rumors and creates distrust among them. Eventually, the bulls separate from one another. Once isolated, they are easily picked off one by one.

Sound familiar? 

Modern politics has become a never-ending exercise in division. Americans are encouraged to view neighbors, coworkers, and even family members not as fellow citizens but as enemies. Political parties, media outlets, influencers, and social media algorithms profit from outrage. The more divided we become, the more power flows to those who benefit from the chaos.

The lion in Aesop's story didn't defeat the bulls through strength. He defeated them through division.

Today's political operatives understand the same lesson. Convince people that every disagreement is a battle, every election is the end of democracy, and every opponent is beyond redemption. Once citizens stop seeing common interests, they become easier to manipulate.

None of this means we should abandon our principles. Bulls don't have to agree on everything to stand together against a common threat. A healthy society requires debate. It also requires recognizing that most Americans want many of the same things: safe communities, economic opportunity, and a better future for their children.

The lion's strategy worked thousands of years ago because the bulls forgot who their real adversary was.

Aesop would probably recognize our politics immediately. The only question is whether we recognize the lesson.

The answer: we do not.

Parents Don’t Parent Anymore. They Compete.

There used to be a visible line between parents and children.

Not a cruel line. A line of responsibility. A line of wisdom. A line that said: I’ve already walked through this stage of life, so my job is to prepare you for what’s ahead.

Now?

Parents and kids dress alike, talk alike, dance alike, listen to the same music, shop in the same stores go to the same clubs, use the same slang, and fight for the same attention online.

Half the time you can’t tell who’s raising who. It's time to stop trading wisdom for trends.

Parents used to embarrass kids because they were “old.” Now some parents are terrified of looking old. Terrified of aging. Terrified of being disconnected from youth culture. So instead of guiding the next generation, they chase it.

Everybody wants to be young forever. Nobody wants to be the elder anymore.

And children suffer because of it. A child does not need another friend.

A child needs structure.
A child needs correction.
A child needs protection.
A child needs perspective.

Most importantly, a child needs somebody willing to say:
“No.”
“That’s wrong.”
“You can do better.”
“Here’s who you are.”
“Here’s where you come from.”

But modern parenting increasingly revolves around comfort and image instead of preparation.

Parents are recording dances with children instead of reading with them.
Buying expensive shoes while schools fail them academically.
Keeping up with trends while kids grow up emotionally lost.

This problem becomes even more dangerous in Black communities because identity is already under attack from every direction.

If schools remove Black history or water it down into a few sanitized paragraphs every February, then where are Black children supposed to learn about themselves?

Where do they learn about:

• The kingdoms that existed before slavery?
• Black inventors and scientists?
• Black resistance movements?
• Economic independence?
• Community building?
• Media literacy?
• Why certain systems exist the way they do?

If home doesn’t teach it and school won’t teach it, then social media will. And social media is a terrible teacher. Algorithms raise more children than grandparents now.

That should terrify people.

A generation that does not know its history becomes easy to manipulate. Easy to market to. Easy to distract. Easy to divide. If all a child learns about Blackness comes from entertainment, celebrity culture, trauma, and consumerism, then they begin to confuse visibility with identity.

Representation is not the same thing as education.

Seeing successful Black entertainers matters. But if every conversation begins and ends with athletes, rappers, influencers, and viral moments, children start believing success only exists in narrow forms.

Where are the conversations about:

• Black architects?
• Farmers?
• Educators?
• Engineers?
• Organizers?
• Historians?
• Ownership?
• Discipline?
• Family legacy?

Some parents know every lyric to the newest songs but cannot explain who Marcus Garvey was.
Cannot explain Ida B. Wells.
Cannot explain Carter G. Woodson.
Cannot explain why the Tulsa Race Massacre matters.

That is not just an educational problem. It is a spiritual problem.

Children without historical grounding search for identity in trends. Trends change every six months. Identity should survive generations.

None of this means parents must become robotic authority figures disconnected from culture. Parents can enjoy music. Have style. Be modern. Be relatable.

But parenting requires distance.

Not emotional distance. Not cruelty. Perspective.

The parent should not be racing their child to stay young. They should be preparing their child to grow wisely.

Somewhere, adulthood became unfashionable. Responsibility became “boring.” Wisdom became less valuable than relevance.

And now society has millions of adults desperate to be seen, while millions of children desperately need guidance.

A culture survives when elders teach. Not when elders imitate.

Children do not need parents who can go viral. They need parents who can lead.

Let the church say, "Amen."

When AI Can't Tell Us Apart, Who Pays the Price?

I ran a simple experiment. I uploaded the same photo of singer Durand Bernarr into three different AI apps and asked each one to identify him (because I'm old and I didn't know who dude was on the awards show I was watching).

The results?

One confidently said Usher. Another insisted it was Lucky Daye. The third... well, it found another random Black man that wasn't even close.

Three guesses. Three wrong answers. Three completely different people.

If AI can't correctly identify a Grammy-nominated artist whose photos are all over the internet, why should anyone trust it to identify the average citizen standing in front of a camera?

Courtesy of 2026 BET Awards

Now let's talk about the elephant mounted on every telephone pole.

Flock cameras.

They're popping up everywhere. Neighborhoods. Shopping centers. Apartment complexes. Highways. The sales pitch sounds great: safer communities through smarter technology.

Who doesn't want safer neighborhoods?

But there's one question that doesn't get asked nearly enough.

What happens when the technology gets it wrong?

History has already shown that facial recognition technology has often performed worse on people with darker skin tones than on white faces. Researchers have documented those disparities for years. While many systems have improved, they're not perfect, and not every company uses the same technology or the same standards.

That matters.

Because if an AI system mistakes one Black man for another, the consequences aren't just an embarrassing error message.

• Someone gets questioned.
• Someone gets detained.
• Someone has to prove they weren't where the computer claims they were.

And once suspicion enters the room, it doesn't always leave just because the facts finally show up.

My little experiment wasn't a scientific study. It was simply a reminder that confidence isn't the same thing as accuracy. The AI didn't hesitate. It answered as if it knew exactly who it was looking at.

It didn't.

That's what concerns me most.

Computers don't have to be malicious to cause harm. They just have to be wrong often enough in situations where being wrong carries serious consequences.

We're racing to install cameras everywhere while assuming the software behind them deserves our trust.

Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't.

But shouldn't we demand proof before allowing algorithms to help identify suspects?

Technology should assist investigations, not replace common sense.

If AI can confidently mistake Durand Bernarr for Usher, who's to say it won't confidently mistake your neighbor for someone wanted three counties away?

The danger isn't that AI makes mistakes. People do that every day.

The danger is that people often believe a computer simply because it's a computer.

And that's exactly when common sense needs to be louder than artificial intelligence.

Stop Recording. Start Running.

Every time I scroll through social media, I see another fight. 

Not an argument. Not a shouting match. A fight.

And almost every time, the video starts the same way. Someone pulls out a phone. Then another person pulls out a phone. Then five more people pull out phones.

Before long, you've got a crowd of amateur cinematographers standing three feet away from two people throwing punches as if they're covering a heavyweight championship fight for ESPN.

Then it happens.

A gun appears.

The crowd scatters.

The video cuts off.

And somewhere in the comments, people are writing "I can't believe this happened."

Really? Because I can.

What I can't believe is how we've somehow taught an entire generation that the first response to danger is to hit Record instead of running.

I remember being in shady nightclubs as a 20-something and if a fight broke out, your survival instincts kicked in. You got away from the situation. You didn't move closer to get a better look. You didn't stand around hoping to capture the perfect punch. You certainly didn't stay long enough to find out whether somebody had a weapon. 

You left.

Because common sense told you that if two people are willing to fight in public, there's no telling what happens next. 

And there were numerous times my homies and I felt the vibe of the place shift and got out of there before the fight even started. If we saw two guys posturing up and planting that back foot, we knew a punch was going to be thrown soon. Or the tell-tell sign of trouble was someone walking out of the club after a disagreement (because you knew that he was going to his vehicle to retrieve a weapon).

Today's social media culture has flipped that instinct upside down. Everything is content. Every moment is an opportunity for views.

The problem is that real life isn't content. Real life has consequences. A fistfight can become a shooting in seconds. A crowd can become a crime scene in seconds.

And the people filming often become victims simply because they stayed around longer than they should have.

What's especially troubling is that many young people have never been taught a simple rule:

If violence starts, create distance.

Immediately.

Not after you get a few seconds of footage. Not after you post it to your story. Not after you see who wins.

Immediately.

Schools spend time teaching fire drills. They teach lockdown drills. They teach severe weather procedures. Maybe we also need to teach situational awareness. Maybe we need to teach kids that their phone is not more important than their safety. Maybe we need to teach them that nobody has ever regretted leaving a dangerous situation too early.

Every tragic video that circulates online carries the same silent lesson. Most people watching the footage are focused on what happened during the fight.

I'm focused on the people standing around it. Because many of them had a chance to leave. Not because they were trapped but because they were filming.

I'm not suggesting that recording incidents never has value. There are situations where documentation matters. But a random fight in a parking lot, school hallway, gas station, or street corner isn't a documentary project.

Your first responsibility is your own safety. The phone can wait. The likes can wait. The views can wait.

Your life can't.

Parents, please teach your children this.

The Cost to Relationships and Families

This is part five of a five-part series entitled "The Silent Collapse of Men in the Smart Phone Era". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with men who are friends or relatives. The men's ages range from 23 - 51 years old. I'd love your feedback.

The Cost to Relationships and Families

A distracted man may still physically be present while emotionally disappearing.

He comes home but never fully arrives.
He sits with his kids while staring at another man’s podcast clip.
He lies next to his wife while scrolling through strangers.
He loses interest in conversation because his brain now expects constant stimulation every eight seconds.

Over time, resentment grows on both sides.

The family notices. Children notice. Partners notice.

The phone quietly becomes the third person in every relationship.

Men Need Purpose More Than Distraction

Most men do not need another motivational clip.

They need:

• sleep
• discipline
• friendship
• purpose
• physical activity
• real conversation
• time away from screens
• connection with their families

The solution is not becoming anti-technology. Phones are tools. The problem begins when the tool starts shaping a man’s identity, emotions, confidence, and attention span. A phone should assist a man’s life, not replace it. 

Right now, too many men are slowly disappearing into distraction while calling it entertainment. We have to stop making excuses and help each other focus on what's important. We have to hold each other accountable and allow entertainment to be entertainment and real life to be real life.

We can't blend the two.

Part 4: Rage Is Becoming Entertainment

Rage Is Becoming Entertainment

This is part four of a five-part series entitled "The Silent Collapse of Men in the Smart Phone Era". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with men who are friends or relatives. The men's ages range from 23 - 51 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Rage Is Becoming Entertainment

Somewhere along the way, anger stopped being an emotion and became a product.

Social media algorithms have figured out something disturbing: angry people stay engaged longer. So every day we're fed outrage clips, gender wars, political hostility, public humiliation, and endless conflict disguised as entertainment.

For a lot of men, it's happening so gradually they don't even notice. The economy is stressful. Relationships can be challenging. The people making decisions that affect our lives often seem disconnected from the consequences. Then social media pours gasoline on that frustration 24 hours a day because anger generates clicks.

What used to be limited to boxing matches and mixed martial arts has expanded into nearly every corner of culture. "Reality" TV thrives on conflict. Viral videos thrive on confrontation. Comment sections thrive on outrage.

We've become conditioned to watch people get punished.

There was a time when minding your business and letting karma do its work was enough. Now many people feel cheated if they don't get a front-row seat to someone else's downfall.

The problem is that constant exposure to rage doesn't just change what we watch. It changes who we become.

Maybe the most rebellious thing a man can do today is refuse to be angry on command.

Part 3: Sleep Is Being Destroyed

Part 5: The Cost To Relationships And Families

Sleep Is Being Destroyed

This is part three of a five-part series entitled "The Silent Collapse of Men in the Smart Phone Era". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with men who are friends or relatives. The men's ages range from 23 - 51 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Sleep Is Being Destroyed

Men are staying awake later than ever:

• scrolling sports debates (I'm guilty of this)
• gaming
• gambling
• watching highlight clips (Guilty again)
• arguing online
• consuming rage content (Been there. Done that.)

Then they wake up exhausted, irritable, mentally foggy, and disconnected from their families.

A tired man becomes a short-tempered husband.
A distracted man becomes a distant father.
An emotionally absent man becomes a stranger in his own house.

And most of it starts with “just checking my phone for a few minutes.” 

We have to learn how to disconnect because it's taking way too much of a toll on our lives and families. The glow of the phone lighting up the bedroom every night is a sign that you no longer have control over your life. You have to prioritize sleep in order to function in a society that is more chaotic everyday than it was just one week prior.

This world will chew you up and spit you out if you don't rest. And filling your subconscious with endless content right before bed won't allow you to truly unwind thus always keeping you on edge.

Part 2: Hustle Culture Is Burning Men Out

Part 4: Rage Is Becoming Entertainment

Hustle Culture Is Burning Men Out

This is part two of a five-part series entitled "The Silent Collapse of Men in the Smart Phone Era". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with men who are friends or relatives. The men's ages range from 23 - 51 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Nobody talks enough about what smartphones and social media are doing to men because male dysfunction usually gets disguised as “normal behavior.”

A man isn’t always crying when he’s depressed. Sometimes he’s just staring at sports clips for four hours, scrolling through millionaire lifestyles he’ll never reach, gambling on games he doesn’t care about, watching pornography instead of connecting with his partner, or mentally checking out while sitting three feet away from his family.

Modern men are not simply distracted. Many are emotionally sedated. Social media didn’t invent male insecurity, but it industrialized it.

Every day, men consume an endless stream of:

• richer men
• stronger men
• taller men
• more successful men
• men with luxury cars
• men with “perfect” relationships
• men claiming to make $20,000 a month doing nothing

After enough exposure, regular life starts feeling like failure.

A man with a decent job, loving children, and a stable home can suddenly feel inadequate because some influencer rented a Lamborghini for a weekend and filmed motivational speeches in front of it. Civilization, huh?

The internet constantly tells men:

• work harder
• sleep less
• grind more
• dominate
• never relax
• never be satisfied

Rest is treated like weakness.

Average men now feel guilty for having ordinary lives, even though most meaningful lives are ordinary. Raising children. Paying bills. Showing up consistently. Being dependable. None of those things trend online because stability is boring content.

The algorithm rewards extreme wealth, extreme anger, extreme fitness, extreme opinions...

Moderation doesn’t go viral. As a result, many men feel permanently behind in a race they never agreed to join.

Part 1: Pornography and Emotional Numbness

Part 3: Sleep Is Being Destroyed

Pornography and Emotional Numbness

This is part one of a five-part series entitled "The Silent Collapse of Men in the Smart Phone Era". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with men who are friends or relatives. The men's ages range from 23 - 51 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Pornography and Emotional Numbness

One of the least discussed issues is how smartphones have changed intimacy.

Many men now consume endless stimulation through pornography and social media while becoming emotionally disconnected from real relationships. Attention spans shrink. Patience disappears. Real intimacy starts feeling “slow” compared to instant digital gratification.

Some men stop pursuing connection altogether because rejection online feels constant:

• ignored messages
• comparison culture
• status competition
• unrealistic expectations

Instead of improving emotionally, many retreat digitally. The result is loneliness hidden beneath entertainment and it's sad to see. So many guys who have millions of options at their fingertips but 99% of them aren't a reality.

And even if a lot of the options were available are they even real? Guys get so enamored with edited and curated photos to the point that seeing a woman in real life is almost disappointing to them. There's no air brush filter when someone is standing in front of you. No perfect pose when someone is in motion. 

So many guys have become numb to real women and it's sad that the appreciation is gone. Older men need to teach younger guys to treat social media as they do TV shows and movies. It's not all real. It's entertainment. Fantasy. Thirst trap.

There are so many beautiful women on this planet who do not need social media magic to look like someone special and men need to start appreciating them again.

Part 2: Hustle Culture Is Burning Men Out

The Validation Trap

This is part five of a five-part series entitled "Cell Phones, Social Media, and the Quiet Depression Affecting Women". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with multiple women including my wife, some coworkers, and random servers at restaurants. The women's ages range from 20 - 53 years old. I'd love your feedback.

The Validation Trap

Many women now unconsciously measure worth through digital attention.

Likes become emotional rewards.
Views become self-esteem markers.
Replies become proof of desirability.

When validation becomes external, emotional stability becomes fragile.

A woman can post a photo feeling beautiful, then spiral emotionally because engagement was lower than expected. Another may become dependent on online attention because it temporarily fills emotional emptiness offline.

This creates a dangerous cycle where identity slowly becomes tied to public approval.

And public approval is one of the most unstable currencies on Earth.

I hope that you've enjoyed this series. And I thank the women who contributed to this. Most of them unknowingly did which is why I didn't list any names. Some of the women had an understanding of the impacts of their cell phones while others were the unknowing victims of theirs. This all transpired over general conversation across a 3-day period. 

The answer to all of this isn’t simply throwing phones away. Cell phones are tools. Social media itself is not automatically evil. The real issue is unregulated consumption and emotional dependence.

Women deserve spaces where they can exist without constant comparison. Without endless performance. Without feeling behind in life every five minutes.

Real peace usually returns through boundaries:

• Putting phones down before bed
• Limiting comparison-heavy content
• Spending more time in real conversations
• Protecting relationships from digital interference
• Rebuilding hobbies and identity outside social media <-- super important!
• Learning to value reality over presentation

Because the truth is simple: A peaceful life rarely looks viral.

The happiest moments are often the ones nobody posts.

And maybe the most radical thing a woman can do today is stop letting strangers on a screen define whether her own life is enough.

I have an upcoming series of how social media impacts the lives of men as well. Be sure to follow me to be alerted of when that will drop. 

And if you missed any of the previous parts of this series then try the links below!

Part 1: Comparison Is Quietly Destroying Peace

Part 2: Doom Scrolling Is Destroying Sleep

Part 3: Relationships Are Slowly Being Eroded

Part 4: Parenting Suffers, Too

Parenting Suffers, Too

This is part four of a five-part series entitled "Cell Phones, Social Media, and the Quiet Depression Affecting Women". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with multiple women including my wife, some coworkers, and random servers at restaurants. The women's ages range from 20 - 53 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Parenting Suffers, Too

Children notice distraction long before adults admit it.

Many mothers are physically present but mentally trapped inside their phones. Some are exhausted from late-night scrolling and enter the day emotionally depleted before parenting even begins.

Kids compete with notifications now.

A child trying to tell a story interrupts a scrolling session.
A family moment gets shortened because someone wants to check social media.
Attention spans weaken for both parents and children.

And there’s another issue people avoid discussing: children absorb emotional energy. If a mother constantly feels insecure, anxious, resentful, lonely, or emotionally overstimulated because of social media consumption, that atmosphere eventually touches the household.

Children don’t need perfect mothers. They need emotionally available ones.

Part 1: Comparison Is Quietly Destroying Peace

Part 2: Doom Scrolling Is Destroying Sleep

Part 3: Relationships Are Slowly Being Eroded

Part 5: The Validation Trap

Relationships Are Being Slowly Eroded

This is part three of a five-part series entitled "Cell Phones, Social Media, and the Quiet Depression Affecting Women". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with multiple women including my wife, some coworkers, and random servers at restaurants. The women's ages range from 20 - 53 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Relationships Are Being Slowly Eroded

Phones are changing modern relationships in subtle but devastating ways.

Couples can sit beside each other physically while emotionally living in separate digital worlds. Many women now spend more emotional energy consuming other people’s lives online than nurturing their own relationships offline.

Comparison also creates unrealistic expectations.

A woman constantly consuming “relationship content” may begin expecting her partner to become a therapist, motivational speaker, luxury provider, mind reader, comedian, and emotional healer all at once. Meanwhile, real relationships are messy, repetitive, ordinary, and imperfect.

Social media teaches performance, not partnership.

Even worse, algorithms aggressively push emotionally triggering content because outrage and insecurity keep people engaged longer. Women are repeatedly shown videos about cheating men, failed marriages, toxic relationships, and “high-value lifestyles.” Over time, this can create suspicion, dissatisfaction, and emotional distance even inside decent relationships.

A healthy man can begin feeling inadequate because he cannot compete with fantasy.
A healthy woman can begin feeling unloved because her life doesn’t resemble a curated feed.

The phone quietly becomes the third person in the relationship.

Part 1: Comparison Is Quietly Destroying Peace

Part 2: Doom Scrolling Is Destroying Sleep

Part 4: Parenting Suffers, Too

Doom Scrolling Is Destroying Sleep

This is part two of a five-part series entitled "Cell Phones, Social Media, and the Quiet Depression Affecting Women". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with multiple women including my wife, some coworkers, and random servers at restaurants. The women's ages range from 20 - 53 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Doom Scrolling Is Destroying Sleep

Many women are ending their nights not with rest, reflection, or intimacy, but with doom scrolling.

One video becomes twenty. Twenty minutes becomes two hours. The body is exhausted, but the brain remains overstimulated.

Sleep suffers badly because phones keep the mind emotionally activated. Instead of winding down naturally, women absorb arguments, bad news, celebrity drama, relationship advice, beauty standards, and endless comparison right before bed.

The consequences are bigger than simply “being tired.”

Poor sleep increases anxiety.
It worsens depression.
It damages emotional regulation.
It lowers patience.
It weakens focus.
It intensifies insecurity.

A woman who is mentally drained from lack of sleep often becomes more emotionally reactive in relationships, more overwhelmed as a parent, and more vulnerable to depressive thinking.

And yet millions repeat the cycle nightly because the phone has become both the stress source and the escape from stress.

That’s addiction behavior, even if society refuses to call it that.

Part 1: Comparison Is Quietly Destroying Peace

Part 3: Relationships Are Slowly Being Eroded

Comparison Is Quietly Destroying Peace

This is part one of a five-part series entitled "Cell Phones, Social Media, and the Quiet Depression Affecting Women". It's based on a series of discussions I've had with multiple women including my wife, some coworkers, and random servers at restaurants. The women's ages range from 20 - 53 years old. I'd love your feedback.

Comparison Is Quietly Destroying Peace

There was a time when home was a refuge. You could close the door, sit down, and emotionally reset from the world. Today, for many women, the world follows them into bed, into relationships, into motherhood, and into their own self-worth through a glowing screen that never truly shuts off.

Cell phones have become emotional slot machines. Every swipe promises validation, escape, inspiration, or connection. But what many women are actually receiving is comparison, anxiety, resentment, loneliness, and exhaustion disguised as entertainment.

And the dangerous part is this: it happens slowly.

Not through one dramatic moment. Through thousands of tiny emotional cuts every single day.

Social media was originally sold as a way to connect people. In reality, it often functions as a nonstop highlight reel where women compare their real lives to carefully edited performances.

One woman sees engagement photos while her own relationship feels cold. Another sees luxury vacations while she struggles to pay bills. Another watches influencers show “perfect” motherhood while she feels overwhelmed trying to survive the day.

Eventually, comparison becomes emotional poison.

The problem isn’t simply jealousy. It’s what repeated comparison does to the brain over time. It creates the feeling that everyone else is progressing while you are standing still. Even when those online images are staged, filtered, rented, exaggerated, or financially irresponsible, the emotional impact still lands.

Resentment begins to grow.

Some women begin resenting their partners for not providing the lifestyle they constantly see online. Others resent themselves for not attracting the type of man they think everyone else has. Some begin to feel bitterness toward friends, family, or even strangers who appear to have beauty, money, happiness, attention, or stability more easily.

And social media rarely shows the debt, cheating, loneliness, anxiety medication, fake affection, or emotional emptiness hiding behind those photos.

The illusion always wins.

Part 2: Doom Scrolling Is Destroying Peace

Social Media's Favorite Sport Is Hating People

A couple of days ago, I watched a video of a fight inside of a sports bar. Nothing unusual there. Human beings have been arguing over alcohol, sports, and wounded pride since someone invented fermented fruit and competition.

But the video claimed the fight happened at a Walk-On's restaurant in Madison, Mississippi.

The people that were fighting were white.

The comment section immediately turned into what comment sections always become: a tribal war.

Some people used the video to criticize Madison. Others used it to defend Madison. 

Some tried to connect the behavior of two individuals to an entire city. Before long, people weren't discussing a fight anymore. They were discussing race, politics, morality, intelligence, crime, culture, and every other topic that social media can drag into a mud pit.

The funny thing is this: the video wasn't recorded at a Walk Ons restaurant in Madison. Heck, there isn't even a Walk Ons in Madison which leads me to believe this was originally posted by someone not even from the area. The video isn't even from Mississippi. It appears to be a two- or three-year-old video from a Buffalo Wild Wings in Hoover, AL. A fight that happened during March Madness years ago.

This seems to happen more and more every day.

Videos are constantly being shared with misleading locations, misleading dates, misleading context, or completely fabricated backstories. A fight in one state suddenly becomes proof of a social problem in another. An old video resurfaces as "breaking news." A random crime becomes evidence that an entire race, city, or political party is somehow defective.

And millions of people hit "share" without spending thirty seconds verifying any of it.

Why?

Because the truth is boring. The truth usually sounds something like this: "A small number of people behaved badly."

That's not exciting. What gets engagement is: "These people are all like this."

Social media rewards outrage the same way casinos reward gambling. The platform gets traffic. The creator gets clicks. The audience gets emotional stimulation. Everyone wins except society.

Around central Mississippi, there has long been tension between people in Madison and people in Jackson. Some residents of Madison point to crime and dysfunction in Jackson as evidence that Jackson is failing.

Some residents of Jackson point to examples of bad behavior in Madison and use them as evidence that Madison's self-image is undeserved.

Both groups spend enormous amounts of time collecting evidence against the other side. It's become less about solving problems and more about winning arguments. The internet has turned many people into amateur prosecutors. Nobody investigates their own side. Everyone investigates the opposition. 

A black person commits a crime. Someone posts it.

A white person gets arrested. Someone posts it.

A liberal says something foolish. Someone posts it.

A conservative says something foolish. Someone posts it.

Then thousands of people conclude that one example represents millions of people.

It's like seeing one bad driver in a Nissan Altima and deciding everyone who owns an Altima can't drive.

Yet people do it every day when race and politics are involved. Bad news grabs our attention. Negative information sticks in our memory.

We remember the insult more than the compliment. We remember the scandal more than the success story. We remember the fight more than the thousand ordinary interactions that happened peacefully that same day.

Social media algorithms understand this better than most psychologists. They know anger keeps people scrolling. They know resentment keeps people engaged. They know fear keeps people clicking. And they know that nothing spreads faster than content that tells people their enemies are worse than they imagined.

This is why your feed is full of outrage and rarely full of context. Most people don't want information.

They want confirmation. They want evidence that the people they already dislike are exactly as bad as they suspected.

A misleading video becomes useful because it reinforces an existing belief.

Once that happens, fact-checking becomes inconvenient.

The result is a society where everyone is carrying around a digital bag full of stories about how terrible the other side is.

Republicans. Democrats. Black Americans. White Americans. Men. Women. All have something.

Everyone is collecting grievances like Pokémon cards.

Meanwhile, millions of decent people from every race, political party, and neighborhood are living ordinary lives, going to work, raising children, helping neighbors, paying bills, and never appearing in a viral video.

But ordinary decency doesn't trend. Who wants to see that?

Who All Gonna Be There?

There’s a slang phrase that gets asked almost automatically whenever somebody gets invited somewhere:

“Who all gonna be there?”

Before the date, the time, or even what the event is really about gets a second thought, that question jumps straight to the front of the line.

Now, to be fair, sometimes it’s a legitimate question.

Maybe you’re trying to avoid an ex.
Maybe there’s somebody you truly don’t get along with.
Maybe past experience has taught you that certain combinations of people can turn a peaceful evening into an episode of reality TV nobody asked for.

That part makes sense.

But let’s be honest, most of the time that question isn’t about safety, peace, or avoiding drama.

It’s about measuring the event’s perceived value.

People want to know if the “right” crowd will be there.

Will the popular people show up?
Will there be enough status attached to the room?
Will it be “worth” their time?

In other words, some folks aren’t deciding whether to attend based on the person who invited them.
They’re deciding based on the guest list’s social ranking, like they’re evaluating a nightclub instead of responding to a personal invitation.

And that’s where the common sense part gets lost.

The person inviting you thought enough of you to include you.
Out of everyone they could have called, texted, or told, they thought, I want this person there.

That alone should mean something.

Instead, the first response becomes a quiet judgment: Who else made the cut?

There’s something a little insulting about that.

It subtly tells the host that their invitation alone isn’t enough.
Their presence, their company, and their event only matter if enough “worthy” people are attached to it.

That’s a selfish way to look at relationships.

Sometimes showing up should be about supporting the person who invited you, not auditing the room before you decide if it meets your standards.

Not every gathering needs to pass a popularity test.

Sometimes the real question shouldn’t be “Who all gonna be there?”

It should be: “Do I value the person who invited me enough to show up?”

When Accountability Becomes “Hating” or "Racism"

Somewhere along the way, correction started getting mistaken for persecution.

As a 54-year-old Black man, I come from a generation where being checked for how you carried yourself, how you spoke, or how you presented yourself wasn’t automatically labeled as “hate” or “racism.” Sometimes, it was simply accountability. Not every critique is an attack, and not every consequence is oppression.

Too many young people today have been taught that any pushback against their behavior must come from jealousy, hatred, or bias. If someone questions how they act in public, how they dress for certain environments, or how they speak to others, the immediate response is often, “They’re hating” or "You're being racist against me." 

No, sometimes people are responding to conduct, not identity.

And let’s be honest, the fault doesn’t begin with the youth. It starts with the generation that raised them. Parents who replaced discipline with excuses, structure with friendship, and accountability with endless validation helped create this sense of entitlement. When children are taught they should never be corrected, they grow into adults who think every criticism is discrimination.

Common sense used to tell us that freedom of expression doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. Somehow, that lesson got lost.

Everybody Wants More… But Nobody Wants to Ask Where It Comes From

There’s this quiet lie we all participate in: that there’s always more to go around.

More money. More space. More opportunity. More “next level.”

But nobody wants to admit the obvious truth hiding in plain sight. At some point, “more” stops being created… and starts being taken.

We’re living in a country packed wall-to-wall with ambition. Everybody wants to "level up", but nobody’s asking what happens when millions of people are climbing the same ladder at the same time. Spoiler alert: somebody’s getting pushed off.

And it’s usually not the people making the rules.

Corporate America has mastered this game. They’ll stand on stage talking about “efficiency” and “innovation,” then quietly eliminate entry-level jobs to pad executive bonuses. The same positions that used to give people a starting point? Gone. Automated. Outsourced. Rebranded as “non-essential.”

But those bonuses? Very essential. Funny how that works.

Meanwhile, cities are out here playing real-life Monopoly with their own residents. They’ll slap the word “progress” on a project, tear down neighborhoods, and displace the very people who built the culture they’re now selling back at a premium.

New luxury apartments go up. Property values rise. Tax revenue increases.

And the people who lived there? They get a nice front-row seat… to their own replacement.

We’ve normalized a system where growth often means somebody else loses. But instead of questioning it, we celebrate it. We post about “winning” without acknowledging that for every winner, there’s usually someone quietly holding the loss.

And let’s be honest, this mindset trickles down.

Regular people do it too. Always chasing more, never sitting still long enough to appreciate what they already have. It’s not enough to be stable. Not enough to be comfortable. Not enough to have peace. There’s always this pressure to upgrade, expand, outdo.

But when everybody is reaching, grabbing, and competing in an already crowded space, the math doesn’t add up. Somebody’s slice gets smaller.

That doesn’t mean ambition is the problem. It means blind ambition is.

Because if your version of “more” requires someone else to have less, you’re not building anything. You’re just redistributing struggle in a nicer outfit.

At some point, we have to ask ourselves a real question:

Are we actually progressing… or just getting better at taking?